FEATURE MASTER GIT CODE
Keep in mind that each active release branch represents another version of the code you need to support. This branch is long-lived and isn't merged back into the main branch in a pull request, unlike the feature branches.Ĭreate as many release branches as you need. Use release branches to coordinate and stabilize changes in a release of your code. The build pipeline for your pull requests should be quick to complete, so it doesn't interfere with the review process. Code merged into the main branch should build cleanly. Requires a successful build to complete a pull request.
The added team members review the code and comment on the changes in the pull request.
Automatically adds reviewers when a pull request is created. This approach prevents direct pushes to the main branch and ensures discussion of proposed changes. Requires a pull request to merge code. Set up a branch policy for your main branch that: Your main branch needs these qualities so that feature branches created by your team start from a known good version of code. The code in your main branch should pass tests, build cleanly, and always be current. Keep a high quality, up-to-date main branch Include a build or linked version of your changes running in a staged environment with your pull request. Provide enough detail in the description to quickly bring reviewers up to speed with your changes. Pull requests work better when reviewer responsibilities are shared across the team. Take care assigning the same reviewers to a large number of pull requests. If your team already has a code review process, bring pull requests into what you're already doing. Two reviewers is an optimal number based on research. Some suggestions for successful pull requests: Your team should agree on what's expected from pull request creators and reviewers.ĭistribute reviewer responsibilities to share ideas across your team and spread out knowledge of your codebase. Reviews in pull requests take time to complete. Only merge branches through pull requests that pass your review process.Īvoid merging branches to the main branch without a pull request. The review that takes place in a pull request is critical for improving code quality. Learn more about using feature flags in your code. Use feature flags to manage long-running branches Some suggestions for naming your feature branches:įor information on setting policies to enforce a branch naming strategy, see Require branch folders. You can also include other information in the branch name, such as who created the branch. Use a consistent naming convention for your feature branches to identify the work done in the branch. Look at the commits made in the branch and look at the pull request that merged the branch. Even small fixes and changes should have their own feature branch.Ĭreating feature branches for all your changes makes reviewing history simple. Git branches are inexpensive to create and maintain. These branches are also known as topic branches.įeature branches isolate work in progress from the completed work in the main branch. Use feature branches for your workĭevelop your features and fix bugs in feature branches based off your main branch. Keep a high quality, up-to-date main branch.Ī strategy that extends these concepts and avoids contradictions will result in a version control workflow for your team that is consistent and easy to follow. Merge feature branches into the main branch using pull requests. Use feature branches for all new features and bug fixes. Build your strategy from these three concepts: For more information, see How we use Git at Microsoft. The following branching strategies are based on the way we use Git here at Microsoft. You can collaborate better and spend less time managing version control and more time developing code. Team members publish, share, review, and iterate on code changes through Git branches shared with others.Īdopt a branching strategy for your team. Your team should find a balance between this flexibility and the need to collaborate and share code in a consistent manner. 
Azure DevOps Services | Azure DevOps Server 2022 - Azure DevOps Server 2019 | TFS 2018ĭistributed version control systems like Git give you flexibility in how you use version control to share and manage code.
0 kommentar(er)
